May 30th, 2008

A couple posts ago I gave a video from Fellowship Church’s Easter service. Pace Hartfield, at Fellowship Church, posted a series of videos showing what a creative week is like in their weekly planning process.

Day 1: Monday

Creative Week: Monday from Pace Hartfield on Vimeo.

Day 2: Tuesday

Creative Week: Tuesday from Pace Hartfield on Vimeo.

Day 3: Wednesday

Creative Week: Wednesday from Pace Hartfield on Vimeo.

Day 4: Thursday

Creative Week: Thursday from Pace Hartfield on Vimeo.

Day 5: Friday (but really Saturday)

Creative Week: Friday from Pace Hartfield on Vimeo.

Day 6: Saturday

Creative Week: Saturday from Pace Hartfield on Vimeo.

Written by: James
Posted in Art, Church, Planning, creativity, worship | 2 Comments »
May 28th, 2008

I know this has nothing to do with the culture, art, or the church… but we’re having another baby. For those of you who may not know us well, this is the 2nd addition to our family. According to our ultrasound today, Juliette (my wife) is 8 weeks pregnant and due January 8th. This means Paris (my daughter) will be 16 months when she’s a big sister.

Written by: James
Posted in Personal | 3 Comments »
May 27th, 2008

This last Sunday we sang a song called “You Are My King” and I took a few minutes to attempt to refine the church’s understanding of worship. I am concerned with the modern day church because songs tend to be birthed that imply, “Our [the church's] salvation is the central purpose of salvation.” While I believe that salvation is the reason why Jesus had to die on the cross, we cannot say that it’s at the heart.

“Now my heart is troubled, and what shall I say? ‘Father, save me from this hour’? No, it was for this very reason I came to this hour. Father, glorify your name!” Then a voice came from heaven, “I have glorified it, and will glorify it again.” (John 12:27-28, ESV)

Above all, Christ died so that the Father would be glorified. Now, Christ did still die for us. Christ died because he loves us. None of these thoughts change. The only difference is that when you view it as “Christ died for us above all,” you then are worshiping self. When you say, “Christ died for us… but above all so that God would be glorified,” we then celebrate salvation but it is directed on God.

There’s another song that talks about what Christ did for us, and it says, “that’s why we praise Him and that’s why we sing.” This implies that salvation is the reason we worship, so if Christ did not die for us, we wouldn’t worship Him. However, if man never sinned and all was perfect… would we still worship God? The answer is a resounding “YES!” You see, our worship should NOT be conditional. The central purpose that we worship God is because God is God. Perhaps that song in reference was trying to say, “that’s why we can worship God.” This would be correct (but I still won’t use it in church because that’s not what the song says). There is a subtle difference that is basically the difference between worshiping the One True God, and idol worship. That’s why we can worship God, but it is not why we worship God.

With all that said I told the church that I really struggled with singing “You Are My King” for a while, and even took it off of song list because I hadn’t made up my mind about it. The song focuses very strongly on salvation, but I decided that it’s scriptural because we should celebrate. The song is actually a good example of a song that says, “that’s why we can worship You.”

Written by: James
Posted in Church, Theology, leadership, worship | 2 Comments »
May 26th, 2008

I decided to start posting our song set list (and other elements) we use in our services.

Grace Community Chapel

We focused amazement. We opened up with this video then the rest of the service was only acoustic guitar and a djembe.

Video: Are You Amazed

How Marvelous (I Stand Amazed)

You Amaze Me
Photobucket

You Are My King

Amazing Grace (My Chains Are Gone)
Photobucket

StoneBridge Community Church

Giving It All To You
Photobucket

From The Inside Out
Photobucket

Embrace This Place

Better Is One Day

Open The Eyes of My Heart

May 22nd, 2008

One of the newest “popular” worship songs that has recently swept across the U.S churches is “Let God Arise” by Chris Tomlin. The question is, “is this song scripturally sound?” Should a church be singing a song that proclaims “let God arise?” Here’s the lyrics:

Hear the holy roar of God resound
Watch the waters part before us now
Come and see what He has done for us
Tell the world of His great love

Our God is a God who saves
Our God is a God who saves

Let God arise
Let God arise
Our God reigns now and forever
He reigns now and forever

His enemies will run for sure
The church will stand, she will endure
He holds the keys of life, our Lord
Death has no sting, no final word

This phrase gives implications that God needs to be summoned by His church, which is a little unnerving. I found that Psalm 68 says this phrase and is, most likely, the scriptural basis for this song:

Let God arise, let His enemies be scattered,
And let those who hate Him flee before Him. (Psalm 68:1, NASB)
(click here for full context of Psalm 68)

The ESV translates this verse:

God shall arise, his enemies shall be scattered;
and those who hate him shall flee before him!
(click here for full context of Psalm 68)

Most would agree that simply taking a phrase from scripture doesn’t nessicarly make it scripturally sound. So, does the tone of the song reflect the tone that is in the scriptures?

Written by: James
Posted in Christianity, Church, worship | 3 Comments »
May 19th, 2008

Came across this video from Fellowship Church of their 2008 Easter Service. I was really impressed with the video and graphics and how they timed it with the live song. I was specifically impressed with the production element of this service and how I didn’t feel like it was a distraction… I actually felt like every element really aided to the message and the church’s worship.


True Love from FC Post on Vimeo.

May 17th, 2008

I’ve noticed (over the past few years) various labeling of Christians. Some still label themselves as “Christians,” but other’s are labeling themselves as “Christ followers.” I don’t think that the label is wrong or incorrect, but I’ve wondered the reasoning or motive.

The best thing I can figure is that they do not want to be put in the same boat as most “Christians.” Almost as a way to say, “You can like me. I’m not like all the other Christians. I’m different. I’m purely a follower of Christ.”

Any thoughts?

Written by: James
Posted in Christianity, Church, Culture | 1 Comment »
May 14th, 2008

Beyond Church, in the UK, had a very innovative church launch. They had an artist come in for their first service to produce 12 paintings, in one hour, exploring the question of, “am i your God?”


Here’s what the artist said about the evening:

A few months back through my good flickr buddy asboluv www.flickr.com/photos/asboluv/ i had the opportunity to exhibit a painting for the Moot organisation in a swanky gallery in london. Both Asbo and i sold pieces to a brighton based vicar called Martin.

a few weeks ago i was contacted by Martin and was asked to take part in a live painting session as part of a christian based project exploring peoples view of God. I explained i was not a man of god but he said it didn’t matter. He loved my work and thought it would be interesting to see how i approached the topic from an artists perspective. So i said ‘yeah, why not!’, well you would wouldn’t you?! (he was offering to pay!)

Now i don’t know about you but i’m a rather secretive painter, hiding myself away in my studio (well, family room) doing my thing – thats what us artists do – after all as much as we’d like, we’re never going to be rockstars!

I really struggled with this brief.
-my view of God.
-one hour to paint in.
- in front of a live audience.

i decided to use my stick men as a basis and produce 12 canvasses exploring the question “am i your God?”. the idea was to produce slight variations on the theme. it was hoped that the audience might be drawn to one specific painting, identifying some aspect as something they associate with their own idea of ‘god’ .

12 paintings, one hour – it was only when i got there and someone did the maths, that i realised i had given myself 5 mins per painting! i had added the colour to most of them before getting there. but to say i was bricking my pants was an understatement.

what made matters worse was the place. a beautiful and rather big theatre. what does a theatre have? a stage! and there in the middle of the stage was my table. back lit by huge spots.
i was part of an exploration of what is meant by god, images of god through nature, god in us and god incarnate. video and sound projections and interactive webcam activities.

I approached Martin with idea of giving the work away to those that associated with a particular painting and he was well up for it!

i’m not great at estimating but i’d say there were well over 100 people there. i got all but one picture completely finished in the time.

it was a fascinating evening. explaining my work to strangers gave me a real chance to get my own head around what i do. people seemed to really ‘click’ with certain paintings and many were able to give powerful reasons for that association. that was pretty powerful.

if someone told me 12 months ago that i would be painting live on a stage to a bunch of 100 people, people o f faith, i’d have fallen about laughing. it’s through this mad and fascinating world of flickr these opportunities have opened up to me.
Thanks all. thanks for all the great comments, the wonderful collaborations, wacky projects and great friends.

sorry for the rant.

I’d encourage you to check out his flickr account (My Dog Sighs) and see the comments from artists of the community. It seems to have had an impact on the church, the artist, and the artists around him.

Written by: James
Posted in Art, Church, Culture, creativity | 3 Comments »
May 13th, 2008

Lately I’ve been reading Rob Bell’s book “Velvet Elvis.” I haven’t made up my mind as to how I feel about the book or Rob Bell (thus I’m not ready to endorse it yet). But I did like his views on how Christians label things “Christian” and “non-Christian.” His point was that it is dangerous to label things (other than people) as “Christian” because it then automatically labels everything else as “non-Christian.” What ends up happening is that Christians then accept everything that is labeled “Christian” without ever questioning it.

I would agree with Rob Bell, in this case, that we are in a dangerous place when we start labeling things (besides people) as “Christian” because it assumes that everything that’s not labeled “Christians” is “unChristian.” I also feel like labeling things Christian has almost been a marketing gimmick. Music, T-Shirts, even little mint candies… it’s quite ridiculous actually. Christians not only label things “Christian” but also “Sacred” or “Spiritual.”

Is it possible that everything is created by God and belongs to God… thus, everything by default, is “Christian,” “Sacred,” and “Spiritual.” This isn’t to say that everything honors God, but that everything is/was originally created as honoring to God.

Here’s an interesting video I found on the same topic: Chris Seay – “What Is Sacred?”

Rob Bell – “Everything Spiritual”

Written by: James
Posted in Church, Culture, video | 6 Comments »
May 8th, 2008

What if…

the church was not only relevant, but at the forefront of innovation?

With if…

the church was making culture rather than just trying to keep “relevant?”

What if…

the church strived to find new ways to show their love to God in worship?

What if…

the world looked to church for cultural relevance?

What if…

the church decided to leave traditions passed down from the years of Christendom, and asked the question, “what does it mean to be a Christian in today’s culture?”

What if?

Written by: James
Posted in Church, Culture, creativity, worship | 12 Comments »
  • Media


  • Credits

  • Subscribe


  • Join the discussion

  • login




  • Creative Commons License